Venture capital (VC) markets in Europe and the USA have significant differences in terms of size, funding, and impact on innovation and wealth creation. These disparities can be attributed to various cultural, historical, and psychological factors, as well as regulatory differences.
Size and Funding
As of 2024, Silicon Valley is home to 63 unicorns with a combined valuation of approximately $4.3 trillion. In contrast, the GDP of the entire European Union is around $17.1 trillion. So, the total valuation of Silicon Valley unicorns alone is about 25% of the entire GDP of the European Union.
The USA boasts a much larger VC market compared to Europe. In 2020, the US venture capital ecosystem raised a record $73.6 billion, while Europe raised nearly $24 billion. This difference is even more pronounced when considering funding per startup, with US startups receiving significantly more capital on average. So how can these differences be explained?
Cultural, Historical, and Psychological Factors
- Cultural Attitudes: The American culture of individualism and risk-taking encourages entrepreneurship and investment in high-risk ventures. In contrast, European cultures tend to be more risk-averse and conservative, leading to a more cautious approach to VC investments.
- Historical Context: The US has a long history of successful VC investments, dating back to the early days of Silicon Valley. This history has created a positive feedback loop, where successful exits attract more investors and talent. Europe, on the other hand, has a more fragmented history with VC, leading to slower growth and less investor confidence.
- Psychological Factors: The American Dream narrative plays a significant role in motivating entrepreneurs and investors to take risks. In Europe, the lack of a similar cultural narrative can lead to a more cautious approach to entrepreneurship and investment.
Impact of Regulation
Regulation also plays a crucial role in shaping the VC landscape. The EU is known for its extensive regulatory framework, which can sometimes slow down VC investment activity. For example, the European Venture Capital Funds Regulation (EuVECA) imposes stringent requirements on venture capital funds, such as investing 70% of the capital in eligible companies and providing equity or quasi-equity finance. While these regulations aim to boost transparency and investor protection, they can also create additional hurdles for VC funds. In contrast, the US has a more streamlined regulatory environment, allowing for quicker and more flexible VC investments. This difference in regulatory approach can contribute to the larger and more dynamic VC market in the US.
Tax policy is a core component of regulatory frameworks. In the US, capital gains tax rates are lower than ordinary income tax rates, incentivizing investors. Additionally, carried interest is taxed at the capital gains rate, which is attractive for fund managers. As an aside, there have been proposals by the Democratic Party to change this, effectively taxing carried interest as ordinary income. However, with the outcome of the elections, experts say these proposals have effectively evaporated.
Impact on Innovation and Wealth Creation
The disparity in VC activity between the US and Europe has significant implications for innovation and long-term wealth creation. The larger and more active VC market in the US allows for more startups to receive the funding they need to grow and innovate. This leads to a higher rate of successful exits and wealth creation, contributing to the overall economic growth of the country.
In Europe, the smaller VC market and more conservative approach to investment can hinder innovation and wealth creation. Startups may struggle to find the necessary funding, leading to slower growth and fewer successful exits. This can result in a less dynamic and competitive economy, ultimately impacting the long-term wealth creation potential of the region.
The Netherlands: A Case Study
The Netherlands stands out as one of the more active VC markets in Europe. While much smaller than the US market, the Dutch VC ecosystem has shown significant growth and potential. The country’s strong focus on innovation and entrepreneurship, coupled with supportive government policies, has helped attract both domestic and international investors.
Compared to the rest of Europe, the Netherlands has a more concentrated VC market, with a significant portion of funding going to high-growth startups. This has led to a higher rate of successful exits and a more dynamic startup ecosystem.
In conclusion, while the US leads the way in VC activity and its impact on innovation and wealth creation, Europe, and specifically the Netherlands, shows promising potential. For example, Europe is leading in impact investing and startups addressing the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Additionally, there are innovation hubs like the “Silicon Canals” in Amsterdam and the “Swiss Valley” in Zurich. Furthermore, there are very active startup ecosystems in Eastern Europe in cities like Warsaw, Tallinn, and Bucharest.Addressing the cultural, historical, psychological, and regulatory barriers to VC investment in Europe could help bridge the gap and foster a more vibrant and competitive startup ecosystem.
At Taru, we are here to support the Dutch VC ecosystem. We offer fund administration services built on forward-focused technology and exceptional client service. We are a team of fund administration specialists passionate about redefining fund administration, backed by a reputable independent and global firm.
